So I started to put together this data-type schema, in part to send a
concrete suggestion to MS, and in part to work back into the RDF/OWL
schema (I committed the new version as sbo.n3; still need a good name
for it BTW).
Any comments; particularly on the types?================================================
A data-type library for bibliographic metadata.
namespace dc = “http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/”
dc:title [ “Biblio Datatype Library” ]
dc:creator [ “Bruce D’Arcus” ]
dc:copyright [ “Bruce D’Arcus, 2006” ]
dc:rights [ “Permission to freely use, copy and distribute.” ]
dc:description [ “Provides data-types for use in RDF/OWL or XML
schemas.” ]
start = notAllowed
reference types
div {
reference-types =
“Art”
> “Article”
> “Book”
> “BookSection”
> “Case”
> “ConferenceProceedings”
> “Dissertation”
> “Document”
> “Film”
> “InternetSite”
> “Interview”
> “JournalArticle”
> “Music”
> “Patent”
> “Performance”
> “Report”
> “Thesis”
> reference-type.extension
reference-type.extension = notAllowed
}
role types
div {
role-types =
“Artist”
> “Author”
> “Compiler”
> “Composer”
> “Conductor”
> “Director”
> “Editor”
> “Inventor”
> “Interviewer”
> “Interviewee”
> “Performer”
> “Translator”
> “Writer”
> role-type.extension
role-type.extension = notAllowed
}
div {
date = xsd:date | xsd:gYear | xsd:gYearMonth
}