Naming scheme for note styles

How about:

  • Chicago fullnote, per the manual, with ibid rule:
    chicago-fullnote

  • Chicago short note, per the manual, with ibid rule:
    chicago-note

  • Chicago fullnote, without ibid rule:
    chicago-fullnote-title-always

  • Chicago short note, without ibid rule:
    chicago-note-title-always

  • Chicago fullnote, with ibid:
    chicago-fullnote-ibid

  • Chicago short note, with ibid:
    chicago-note-ibid

That succinctly describes each style’s behavior.

@Sebastian_Karcher is there a need to retain both UUIDs and human-readable IDs, or is link rel=“self” and the title sufficient? It might be possible to incorporate UUIDs into 1.1 by retaining both. So <id> stays the same (or maybe even drops the zotero link) and a new <uuid> property is added. I don’t think that would impact the processors at all, and that would allow clients to continue to use existing behavior relying on the current system while also allowing transition to the stable UUIDs with time?