I’ve raised this issue a few times before, and have finally gotten
close to something I’m happy with.
Question, then: how to configure reference list grouping in a way that
is flexible but elegant, both from an XML standpoint, and WRT to
implementation in a GUI?
Answer:
Add a cs:groups structure to cs:bibliography. Have that solely be
responsible for configuring grouping and ordering (not layout of the
individual reference entries).
Examples:
- Group by creator.
Some styles explicitly group by author (well all author-year styles do,
but they just repeat the author name, or some proxy for it, each entry;
in this case the name is only listed for the first entry).
<groups>
<group by="creator">
<heading type="creator-name"/>
</group>
</groups>
Aside: given what I say parenthetically above, perhaps grouping should
not be optional for author-year types? That detail bears more thought.
-
Group by genre or reference type. This is quite common in the
Legal Documents Newspaper Sources General References
humanities. The logic would work such that if there was no cs:reftype
child, then this would be assumed the default.
Might be bit of a PITA to process, but not too bad.
-
Primary and secondary sources. This is a tricky one, as David has
Secondary Sources Primary Sources
made the argument one would need to assign groups in this case. I am
assuming the formatter can have some generic logic to handle this.
E.g., primary sources do not have publishers, and are not articles? -
Martha’s favorite: see also references; what in BibTeX are called
References Additional Sources
"noncite."
Thoughts? Consider, in particular, how this would all work in a GUI,
or how you would code the processing if you had to write a processor in
your language of choice.
Bruce