So now we have something like:
This doesn’t work for Chicago with the current “one locator” setup
anyway, because every locator requires a label except page. Because
page is the most common locator I have to exclude the label and all
other locators are cited incorrectly.
This is nice and concise (no need to explicitly account for each
kind of
locator), but breaks down if you need to do multiple. The question is
how to get the best of both worlds? I’m actually a little stuck on
this.
In other words, what exactly would you be adding to the Chicago style,
say, to get the effect you’d like to achieve?
Using previous examples, with this macro:
Will let you cite both of these (with locators volume 3, page 25):
Luigi Albertini, The Origins of the War of 1914, trans. Isabella
Massey (New York, NY: Enigma Books, 2005), vol. 3.
Luigi Albertini, The Origins of the War of 1914, trans. Isabella
Massey (New York, NY: Enigma Books, 2005), 3:25.
or, in Nicolae’s example, the following macros (with locators book IX,
chapter III, paragraph 2, page 50-52):
Will let you cite both of these:
Herodot, History, IX, III, 2, edition by…, Place, 2007.
Turcan, /Title about Herodot/, Bucharest, Humanitas Publisher, 2008,
pp. 50-52.
In theory, we could keep locator variables and have something like
this to make sure all locators get cited:
Any of the above will require complicated conditionals but I don’t see
how that can be avoided.
Best,
Elena