Any complaints about doing this? They are probably as useful to other
implementations as they are to me.
Simon
Any complaints about doing this? They are probably as useful to other
implementations as they are to me.
Simon
Simon Kornblith wrote:
Any complaints about doing this? They are probably as useful to other
implementations as they are to me.
What’s a “category term”?
Bruce
Simon Kornblith wrote:
Any complaints about doing this? They are probably as useful to other
implementations as they are to me.What’s a “category term”?
Sorry, that was a little ambiguous. I mean:
"anthropology"
> "astronomy"
> "biology"
> "botany"
> "chemistry"
> "engineering"
> "generic-base"
> "geography"
> "geology"
> "history"
> "humanities"
> "literature"
> "math"
> "medicine"
> "philosophy"
> "physics"
> "psychology"
> "sociology"
> "science"
> "political_science"
> "social_science"
> "theology"
> "zoology"
Simon
Simon Kornblith wrote:> On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Bruce D’Arcus wrote:
Simon Kornblith wrote:
Any complaints about doing this? They are probably as useful to other
implementations as they are to me.
What’s a “category term”?Sorry, that was a little ambiguous. I mean:
I guess since those are essentially short-labels for URIs, and the
natural language labels may well be useful in some cases, you may as well.
Bruce