subsequent-author-substitute="———."

CSL Development
1

Hello,

Does the subsequent-author-substitute apply to all authors, or only
the first author? Do all authors have to match or only the first one?

This situation:

John Doe, Jane Smith (2005)
John Doe, Jane Smith (2006)
John Doe, William Gates (2007)

will that be:

John Doe, Jane Smith (2005)
---------., Jane Smith (2006)
---------., William Gates (2007)

or

John Doe, Jane Smith (2005)
---------. (2006)
John Doe, William Gates (2007)

And how about this situation:

John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates (2005)
John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates, Bill O’Reilly (2006)
John Doe, Jane Smith, Bill O’Reilly (2007)

will that be:

John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates (2005)
---------., Jane Smith, William Gates, Bill O’Reilly (2006)
---------., Jane Smith, Bill O’Reilly (2007)

or

John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates (2005)
---------., Bill O’Reilly (2006)
John Doe, Jane Smith, Bill O’Reilly (2007)

or

John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates (2005)
---------., William Gates, Bill O’Reilly (2006)
---------., Bill O’Reilly (2007)

or

John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates (2005)
John Doe, Jane Smith, William Gates, Bill O’Reilly (2006)
John Doe, Jane Smith, Bill O’Reilly (2007)

Johan–
http://www.johankool.nl/

2

This.

An “author” for these purposes represents the group of authors. Where
the group changes in ANY way (including order), it’s a different
"author."

Same logic applies to generate the year suffix of course. So:

John Doe, Jane Smith (2005a)
---------. (2005b)
John Doe, William Gates (2005)

Bruce