As some of you might have noticed, I’ve recently gone through most of the
independent styles in the style repository, updating titles, ids,
documentation links, and adding ISSNs and default-locales.
One thing I think we should discuss is how exactly we want to deal with
default-locale and style localization. I’m of the firm opinion that any
journal-specific CSL style should carry the default-locale attribute set to
the journal’s locale. On the other hand, I definitely see value in having a
selection of styles without a default-locale attribute that (automatically)
localize. I think we can improve the current user experience with three
changes:
- we should decide which styles we want to keep without a default-locale
(I guess this will be mostly the most popular style guides, like APA,
Vancouver, CMoS, some Harvard variant, etc.) - for these styles, make sure localization is as complete as possible
(e.g. we probably should use localized date formats, which currently almost
no style uses) - make it clear to users which styles localize, and which don’t
Rintze