[Feedback CSL 1.0.2]: Publication type "event"

CSL Development
16

These are the number variables:

  variables.numbers =
    "chapter-number"
    | "citation-number"
    | "collection-number"
    | "edition"
    | "first-reference-note-number"
    | "issue"
    | "locator"
    | "number"
    | "number-of-pages"
    | "number-of-volumes"
    | "page"
    | "page-first"
    | "part-number"
    | "printing-number"
    | "section"
    | "supplement-number"
    | "version"
    | "volume"

(part-number, printing-number, supplement-number are new in 1.0.2; I pushed a commit to my PR making them -number in 1.0.2)

These are the title variables:

  variables.titles =
    "collection-title"
    | "container-title"
    | "original-title"
    | "part-title"
    | "reviewed-title"
    | "title"
    | "translated-title"
    | "volume-title"

So:

  1. :heavy_check_mark: volume to volume-number I think should change.
  2. :heavy_check_mark: issue to issue-number probably
  3. :x: locator is an object, so clearer to leave without
  4. :x: edition, version, section are reasonably likely to be non-numeric, so we should leave these
  5. :question: page we’ve discussed making possible to contain other types of locators (e.g., column numbers), like locator, so I suggest we leave this (or discuss some other change).
  6. :question: number would perhaps better be labeled document-number. It is currently used both for document numbers (e.g., reports, patents, legislation, legal cases) and in Zotero for episode numbers on broadcasts. That creates some problems that could be addressed by understanding number to be a document number and an episode number to be page and/or chapter-number.