Endnote xml'y format

This is pulled from a word document my collaborator sent me. It’s the
text of an inline Endnote reference, to see if you have to click on the
in text cite and say “Toggle Codes”. I added some formatting to make
the structure clearer:

This looks eminently parse-able.

Google gives a few references to it eg.

http://www.mat.ethz.ch/research/publications/xml_format

but they all say it isn’t documented (but that page offers everything
short of a schema). Anyone know anything more?

–J

Kidder 1981 423 References plus.enl EndNote 423 6 Louise H. Kidder Research Methods in Social Relations 4th 1981 New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston

–James
+1 315 395 4056
Details: http://freelancepropaganda.com/jameshowison.vcf

I created a RELAX NG schema of the latest Endnote XML DTD awhile back
that fills in some of the non-documented information (so I had to
convert the standard DTD, and then add in additional structure; for
example for the critical reference types).

See here IIRC:

http://www.users.muohio.edu/darcusb/files/endnote-xml.tar.gz

BruceOn Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:43:40 -0500, “James Howison” <@James_Howison> said:

BTW, I think the format documented above is an older version. The newer
one is better (though still not great).

BruceOn Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:43:40 -0500, “James Howison” <@James_Howison> said:

Hey all… the new repository is functional and is temporarily hosted at:

http://66.93.224.237/svn/citeproc/

This will revert back to
http://citeproc-source.x2x2x.org/svn/citeproc/ when I flip the switch
on this machine to accept traffic from 66.93.224.14, the IP of the
existing server. I am just finishing up with importing all of trac
stuff and once this is functional and I have verified the ability to
host other projects on the same Trac server I will be make the final
switch. In the mean time can you use this the above IP to check
anything new into?

Let me know if you have any troubles with this. I am also looking at
trying to make this install SSH friendly… I’ll let you know how it
turns out :smiley:

Cheers :slight_smile:

<M:D/

Is there anything you can’t do :wink:

BTW, sorry for cross posting that last. Now the bibdesk-develop list
knows about the secret server… I should control my urge to speak
widely!

Cheers,
JamesOn Mar 27, 2005, at 6:22 PM, Bruce D’Arcus wrote:

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:43:40 -0500, “James Howison” <@James_Howison> > said:

Google gives a few references to it eg.

http://www.mat.ethz.ch/research/publications/xml_format

but they all say it isn’t documented (but that page offers everything
short of a schema).

BTW, I think the format documented above is an older version. The
newer
one is better (though still not great).

Bruce


SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click


xbiblio-devel mailing list
xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

–James
+1 315 395 4056
Details: http://freelancepropaganda.com/jameshowison.vcf

I am also looking at
trying to make this install SSH friendly… I’ll let you know how it
turns out :smiley:

Unless you have another need for SSH access, I would recommend avoiding
Subversion over SSH - it is really only intended for use when you can’t
use it through Apache for some reason. Apart from anything else it can
be a security risk unless you are confident with chroot etc. The
subversion documents also recommend against running a repository with
multiple protocol access. Is there some reason you need SSH?

Matthew

Oh wow, I didnt realize this was the case. Thanks for the tip!

As far as need this is just one of the many requested features over
the last few months that always seemed like a good idea and as such
something to implement when time permitted. But with this new source
of enlightenment it seems obvious this needs to be rethought… thats
Bruce’s job :smiley: I stopped thinking back in 84’… best decision I’ve
ever made :smiley:

Thanks for saving me a few hours from my week! :smiley:

Cheers,

<M:D/

Wait… that would be ‘84, not 84’ :smiley: