Given the lawsuit, does anyone have any sense on whether we should
encourage individual CSL files to include (open) licensing
information?
Bruce
Given the lawsuit, does anyone have any sense on whether we should
encourage individual CSL files to include (open) licensing
information?
Bruce
I think ‘immunity.csl’ is the only CSL file in the Zotero SVN that
links to a license (GPL3).
I still don’t know if I buy that these simple files can have a
copyright. I’m more than happy to slap a notice on them, though.
Something like “Creative Commons:Attribution-Share Alike” would seem
to be a much better fit than GPL3 & would accomplish similar goals.
Thoughts on specific licenses?
–Rick
I was thinking tapping into Creative Commons as well. Am not sure what
difference it would make though.
Bruce
Thoughts on specific licenses?
I guess that nearly any license is better than EndNote’s new
click-through contract:
http://www.endnote.com/support/enstyles-terms.asp
–Rick