# rdfa update

**URL:** <https://discourse.citationstyles.org/t/rdfa-update/732>\
**Category:** CSL Development\
**Created:** [August 15, 2009, 3:23pm UTC](https://discourse.citationstyles.org/t/rdfa-update/732 "2009-08-15T15:23:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bruce\_D\_Arcus1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@Bruce\_D\_Arcus1](https://discourse.citationstyles.org/u/Bruce_D_Arcus1)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2009, 3:23pm UTC](https://discourse.citationstyles.org/t/rdfa-update/732/1 "2009-08-15T15:23:50Z")

</div>

So no big news, but here’s what the citeproc-py default "html+rdfa"  
output (which is just the internal model serialized) looks like ATM:

- J. Doe J. Smith Some title1234239845

Beyond the fact that we now have round-tripping of data  
(notwithstanding ordering of the contributors), I’m thinking this  
should help processing too. For example, I haven’t gotten to it, but  
note that the name nodes carry the structured data (the content  
attribute) with the initialized display form.

Bruce

Bruce